Author
graghost
Respected Poster
Added: Dec 19, 2011 8:40 am
[Yes, the pictures are real but....There is no legal disclaimer of any kind on her new site stating that she is 18. No disclaimer of any kind. Which is more than a little odd. And since models can pose topless well below 18 in some EU countries, her material will not be allowed until legal documentation is presented.

As far as I know, she did turn 18 not that long ago. But it's hard to say just how new these pictures are. It's possible her webmaster intentionally left the legal documentation off the site to help prevent it from being reposted all over the place.

One site that had her previews posted have already pulled them, probably for the same reason I did.

If someone can send me an original picture - clothed please - that has the time stamp on it, that will go a long way in getting the A-OK to post them.

JB]
syllabus07
Good Poster
Added: Dec 19, 2011 10:24 am
and very healthy!
nu-yorker
I'm probably spamming
Added: Dec 19, 2011 4:37 pm
She may be 18, she is from Poland. There is no age information on the site. In Poland you can start working in porn industry if you are 15> Surprised
Jimmy Two Shoes
Good Poster
Added: Dec 19, 2011 5:01 pm
Not to sound skeptical, but are these real? If they are, I am both surprised AND impressed! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Dec 19, 2011 7:53 pm
From multiple sources I have been told that she was well over the age of 18 at the time of these new topless shoots.

I hope everyone understands the cautious approach I took.
graghost
Respected Poster
Added: Dec 19, 2011 8:50 pm
JB Wannabe wrote:
From multiple sources I have been told that she was well over the age of 18 at the time of these new topless shoots.

I hope everyone understands the cautious approach I took.

You were just doing your job as a Mod.
koehper
Respected Poster
Added: Dec 20, 2011 1:31 am
Some years ago I asked the webmaster what it would be of the 18+ models, they said they had no plans about what they would do.

She has been 18 for some time.
heywang2
I'm probably spamming
Added: Dec 20, 2011 1:56 am
Seriously... is this what it has come to?

A "legal" disclaimer from Eastern Europe is worth less than a Mexican Peso... You can't seriously be thinking a legal disclaimer will cover your ass if she is not 18.

Seriously... a little discretion on the mods part would be nice. This zero tolerance is for the birds.

You know in most of the western world 16+ boobs are not illegal and as well a teenagers boobs are also not satan! That includes the USA.

For God's sake this whole forumophilia enterprise is based on breaking the law. Theft...

Do you really think Cherry's boobs will bring this thing crashing to the ground!!!????

So what if they fudged 6-8 months (I doubt they did.) what would it harm?

I assume that to be a mod you must know the teen modeling world pretty good.

And if you do you will know that Cherry is actually Closer to 20 now than she is 18. But of course that doesn't mean her photos are that old. (she doesn't live in Poland btw...)

According to best source I know Cherry's last ***** under 18 set was about a month ago. (Over a year old from when it was actually shot.)

The hair style she is sporting in these topless photos showed up on her social networking site over 4 months ago. (putting her well over 18yo)

[b]This forum has survived by following the "rules". Believe me I appreciate that. [/b]

But the likelihood of this forum going away tomorrow is much greater due to copyright infringement than because of 17yo tits!!!

Add that fact to the verifiable information that is out there that can prove Cherry's exact age to the day... and you will see why I find myself a bit amused and miffed about this whole affair.

And finally... This is obviously a new project from *****. They are based in the Czech Republic and Russia and could give two hoots about your 2577 laws. PLus... topless doesn't need a 2577 disclaimer. You may never see a "legal" disclaimer from these cats!!!

There's a better set of data to base MOD decisions on than the presence of "legal" disclaimer.
sairnath
I'm probably spamming
Added: Dec 20, 2011 12:57 pm
Legal info is now on the site.
UMO
VIP club member
Added: Dec 20, 2011 3:28 pm
sairnath wrote:
Legal info is now on the site.


Now the question is, "that ID is original?"
koehper
Respected Poster
Added: Dec 22, 2011 4:38 am
Well, kowing what these guys from **** went through to keep the sites, it's silly to doubt they wouldn't have new projects for the girls.

But I'm definitely happy Cherry can keep on modeling. Very Happy
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Dec 22, 2011 2:57 pm
Two rules in regards to this thread and any future thread of Cherry.


Rule 1. Do NOT use the name of her old site on this forum.

Rule 2. Do NOT discuss that site, their models or any problems they had.


JB
lisa2006
Poster
Added: Dec 22, 2011 7:01 pm
JB Wannabe wrote:
Two rules in regards to this thread and any future thread of Cherry.


Rule 1. Do NOT use the name of her old site on this forum.

Rule 2. Do NOT discuss that site, their models or any problems they had.


JB


So her new sets can be posted?
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Dec 22, 2011 9:26 pm
As long as they are from the new site, I don't see why not.

With the 'old' site, she may have been 18 in the later sets but I'm not too comfortable with allowing them to be posted. If they are time stamped, I might reconsider. I know this is sorta similiar to the FG situation but FG doesn't have models anywhere near as young as Cherry's old site currently has.
UMO
VIP club member
Added: Dec 23, 2011 8:09 am
Damn, the second set looks good.