|
|
| Author |
Message |
OldPhart VIP club member

Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 348

|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Round and round...and round.
Sexual maturity comes in 2 seperate forms, physical and emotional.
Old enough to bleed is old enough to breed, is true in the physical side. But not necessiarly true on the emotional side which has its own rate of development. When society preaches to young girls to keep their legs crossed, to make sure shes covered up, marage before sex, etc, or shes a whore, its forcing a negative influence on emotional sexual development and is instilling unatural inhabitions as a guard wall against sexual thought. To me this is much worse than promoting natural development of sexual thought. It also has the reaction of making many folks desire it more because it is taboo, verbotten, < CENSORED >... wheather its drugs, alcohol, firearms, nudity... IOW its counterproductive, it creates a desire for these things by limiting access to them.
Nudity does not create sexual thoughts, having sexuality does. Young < < CENSORED > > do not have sexual thoughts, but as they mature they develop to the stage in life that they start having them with clothed people first. Heck, I still do, as do most people.
In a nutshell, the supreme court of the US defines pornography as having no artistic merit and causes sexual thoughts. But what is art? Even artists disagree. Causes sexual thoughts, sexuality causes them. When I was young a strong breeze could cause me to pop a woodie, nothing sexual about wind in and of its self. Wind has no artistic merit, but its legal.
I see nothing wrong with nudity in photographs and movies, at any age. Lets face it, if you find the person sexually attractive, your going to have sexual thoughts even if shes in a nuns habit. Its natural.
OTOH I think that depicting sexual acts should be limited to those who are physically sexually mature, and preferably emotionaly sexually mature. The physical side is easy to determine, but the emotional side may never fully develop. And here in lies the quandry. I agree that their should be an age limit for that. But the question is of what age? As a compromise, it should match the age of consent for sex, in whatever area its produced, to protect the participants, and not be limited by any age limit, anywhere else in the world, for possession or viewing. IOW if its legal for it to be filmed, where its filmed, it should be legal to possess and view anywhere else in the world. Limiting possession and viewing of legally produced material is repression and serves no actual protective purpose for the participants. Protecting the participants should be the only function of these laws, any other excuse is rationalizations and repression.
OP _________________
I'm History again... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ciggy Respected VIP club member
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 739 Location: USA

|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Brilliant way to put it, OP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
heyboy Poster

Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 16

|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:26 am Post subject: Oh how well you've put it. |
|
|
I completely agree with everything you've said OldPhart. It's everything I was trying to say and more, and articulated much better. I thank you.
If you really are an old phart, I guess that shows how much your capacity for reasoning advances as you get older. Yours is obiously more advanced than mine, and that was partly my point. You need to be old enough to make important decisions.
BTW, I never said it was evil or wrong to look at such stuff (I know you didn't say that I had, but just in case anybody thinks I did). That's a different argument to the one I was trying to make. I just think if you do, you should be conscious of the effects its production might have had on its protagonists. I also don't think there's anything wrong with nudity, and I think that it's different to pornography.
Thank you. _________________ "Nothing can be more contrary to religion and the clergy than reason and common sense."
-Francois Marie Arouet "Voltaire", French author and playwright |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OldPhart VIP club member

Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 348

|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Am I really an Old Phart??? Well, how many young folks use the word quandry in a sentence?
That post was inspired by the both of you, aparently butting heads because you were looking at it from different angles. I was inspired by your intercourse and attempted to coalese the concepts as I see them. Without your previous contributions I cound not have written it.
A case of synergy, where the end product is more than the sum of the parts because of your cooperation/sharing ideas I was inspired to sort it out and post.
Thank both of You!
OP _________________
I'm History again... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dennisa6 Good Poster

Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 77 Location: Central Ohio, USA

|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 3:12 am Post subject: Time Out! |
|
|
Wow! There sure has been a lot of smoke in this thread recently!
My suggestion is just to take a time out and enjoy the beauty of the winner of JUNIOR MISS MAY 2005. I just posted the best pics of her collection at the NON-NUDE forum here at TeenFuns. And while there, also check out the very beautifull Junior Miss April 2005.
In the meantime, in case I go to hell, I am having my coffin filled with hot dogs and marshmellows---I do not want those flames to go to waste!
ENJOY!!!!!!! _________________ "Here today, gone tomorrow". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|