Nudolls - FM-teens fans rejoice!

yungt33nluvr · Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:42 am Post subject:

[quote="carrapato"]

doug1111 · Very Respected Poster Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 289

Interesting, very interesting.

BadDevil · VIP club member Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 307

Jackindabox · I'm probably spamming Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 1

GrumpyOne · Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: Grumpy's Review

I had joined this site for a month. They have made a good start, but the fact that I did not renew after my account expired should also say something too. Will I rejoin at some point in the not too distant future - probably?

First for the good news - the site features some very pretty young ladies. The freshness of the models is great and is the biggest asset of this site. There is a good mix of images, videos (mostly softcore, but some hardcore too). The site follows in the "spirt of Teen Funs" and some of the early MyAngelFuns work. I prefer the softer stuff, but understand that the website has to cater to a broader audience.

Please take my less than positive comments with a grain of salt and understand where I am coming from. As some of you may know, my hobby is using the images from various sites and turning them into wallpapers that I post on this site. This means I have high expectations when it comes to videography, photography and quality. I have used one of their sets, using Valentina, in my work. My comments and link to the images are below:

1. The resolution of both the images and the videos is fairly low. There are many sites out there that offer much better quality images, and they are certainly not of a high enough level if this site wants to be a leading / popular site in 2008.

2. While the composition of the images is good, the lighting work needs to improve. Some of the lighting is quite good, but more often than not the scenes look muddy. I know these are not studio shots, but the locations that are used are indoors should allow for better lighting work. This comment goes for for the stills and the videos.

3. The videographer needs to learn how to hold the camera without shaking or moving. The results can be a bit distracting. Perhaps getting so close to these beautiful young naked women is distracting him?

4. The background music is a bit loud. I don't necessarily want the whole world to know I'm watching porn. I prefer the "natural" sound recorded during the shoot - and I don't mean faked orgasms.

They have made a good start, and the potential to be a great site (i.e make lots of money for the owners) is there. They have the right idea, good looking and fresh-faced models. Thy just need to improve the quality of their work to stand out from the other sites to be successful and keep on growing.

The Grumpy One

tbh · Very Respected Poster Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 257

Fantastic review, thanks for taking the time

Darkmeister · I'm probably spamming Joined: 17 Jul 2008 Posts: 1

Hmm some interesting views on nudolls/fm teens here. Im a big fan of the photography on both these sites, and am wanting to find more like it.

Especially from the same ppl who do the videos for both fm and nudolls. Does anyone know of any other sites done by the same people?

FM Teens has changed recently, doesnt look like they are going to do any more girl girl sets - it leans now more towards HC(ish) with solo masturbation, both indoors and in public.

Eponine · Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:33 pm Post subject: Woh!

Beetie Beetie Beetie; uh oh Buck better get the credit card. Wink