Why are Mario Salieri films always poor quality/unsharp?

I have watched a lot of porn, over many many years and I have a very large collection.
I am always on the lookout for quality resolution videos from the past. And by quality I mean, the video is totally sharp, the colours are spot on, the video is the full actual video and no bullshit stuff added or parts cut from the original.

One thing I have experienced, every single time I come across a claimed "upscaled" or "remastered" video of Mario Salieri's, is that the video quality is very poor. It is either out of focus or "woolly" and it always looks like it been produced wrong. I have no idea why this is.
I realise there is a large variance of the video quality people can produce, but come on, these films are always bad, poor and not worth watching. Why is this?

Why go to the bother of re-working a video if its going to be bad? I just don't get it.

I don't see this problem with any other time period, studio, or genre, so why is it that I only see this with Mario Salieri films? Yes, I see poorly upscaled and remastered videos, but this is intermittent and it comes down to a particular person on a given website. Its not all the time for a studio or period of time.
I have films from the 1970s and 1980s in 1080 and 4K, that are super crystal clear, sharp, beautiful colour and have been expertly re-worked.

So what is the problem with Mario Salieri films?

In my opinion, it's just the "Salieri's touch".
Personally, I don't like it, but when I see a movie for the first time, and even I'm not a movie pro, I can easily tell if it's something from the Salieri's studios.
So from this point of view, he succeeded: he's the only director I can name just by seeing a still picture of one of his movies

I don't know his story, but his movies often talks about war and religion. So I guess it's a result of some kind of ****hood trauma.

Anyway, he does it on purpose.