Author
alex
Good Poster
Added: Dec 21, 2004 7:18 pm
The dayanna series has number 293. I can't remember if the pictures were sorted by numbers but maybe it is easier to search for number.

And the 'Uma categorie' means 'pictures removed for unclear (possibly age?) reasons'.
Dispositioner
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 11, 2005 6:43 am
So let me get this straight, pictures of Dayanna from Teenfuns are allowed to be posted, but pictures of the exact same girl from another site can't be posted? Something doesn't add up here. If she's illegal on one site, then she's also illegal on another. This is further proof that you should NEVER listen to authority. Rules are for suckers.
jejejeje
Respected VIP club member
Added: Jan 11, 2005 7:16 am
Maybe she's got older.

Wink
markus1
Retired Legend
Added: Jan 11, 2005 12:31 pm
Dispositioner wrote:
If she's illegal on one site, then she's also illegal on another.


How does this make sense? Unless the photos were done at the same time.
Calahan
Very Respected Poster
Added: Jan 11, 2005 12:43 pm
EDIT: After re-reading my answer, I think I take it back...
(Can't delete posts, when answers were posted)

All the best,
Calahan
mck
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Problem is that for someone is legal 18 and under 18 is illegal.
I hate when we play "the puppet show" about girls age. Here is posing naked under 18 legal , but needs parental agreement !!!
Dispositioner
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 12, 2005 7:42 am
Dayanna (Alina on the other site) was 14 in 2003. Meaning she's only about 15 or 16 now. So no, she is not legal. She's either lying about her age to teenfuns, or more likely, teenfuns know's how young she is but they have the right documentation to get away with it.
Jenna16
Poster
Added: Jan 12, 2005 9:15 am
I would say that she'd be 18 now. The LS sites lied about the ages on their sites. Taake LS-Mag issue 1. The girls were all over 18, but it said they were 12 & 13. Pfft, as if!
markus1
Retired Legend
Added: Jan 13, 2005 12:24 am
This seems more likely. I can well imagine sites claiming their models are younger than actual age in order to attract those surfers who are looking for that.
Dispositioner
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 13, 2005 10:12 am
Jenna16 wrote:
I would say that she'd be 18 now. The < CENSORED > sites lied about the ages on their sites. Taake < CENSORED > issue 1. The girls were all over 18, but it said they were 12 & 13. Pfft, as if!


They may have lied about some of the girl's ages, but I'm sure there's a reason why the company was raided by police and one of the owners is in jail now. Dayanna/Alina certainly LOOKED the age they were saying she was. This article is about the LS sites:

Reuters Agency 28 Jul 2004

Police Shut Ukraine Model Agency in Porn Crackdown.

KIEV (Reuters) - U krainian police shut a modeling agency which photographed und erage girls and sold images over the Internet

in North America as part of their biggest crackdown on ch ild pornography, officials said on Wednesday.

Interfax-Ukraine news agency quoted Vitaly Yarema, deputy head of the Interior Ministry crime investigation department,

as saying police were questioning about 15 people about the agency, which operated for three years across the country.

Police said the agency had attracted around 1,500 girls aged from eight to 16 to their offices in the capital Kiev,

Kharkiv in the east and Simferopol in the south.

"The pictures (of the girls) were then sent to the United States and Canada via Internet channels," Yarema said.

Police also froze the bank accounts of the agency, which earned "hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars" in the past

three years.

UNIAN news agency said police confiscated video equipment, computers, images of chi ldren, financial documents and a Porsche

belonging to the group organizer, a U krainian in his mid-20s.

U krainian police worked on the case for several months with the FBI.
ronny
Respected Poster
Added: Mar 25, 2005 3:21 pm
Any video of in TF ??