where can I find this girl ??

I think UMO should take another good look at his own sig if he decides to be a champion of the rules.

UMO wrote:


UMO you are a funny guy, check your
Signature:

I see nothing wrong with UMO's sig.
What rule(s) did he break with it
Why hasn't GS said or done something about it IF it did break any rules

The logical conclusion is its fine by the rules.



OP

I have no problem with his sig. I have no problem with this post. Neither of them have been deleted by the mods or admins here. The signature, as well as the pictures posted in this topic both do the same thing... draw attention to the girls and censored topics. I would just rather see someone stick one way or the other about it. Don't quote the rules at someone who has done nothing more than you have done. Not that I really care... I just felt like saying something. Whatever.

All the models of my signature are TEENS, because I like just TEENS g¡rls.

An example, when Britney Spears was 15 y.o. old I didnt like her, I liked her when she was 18 y.o. old.

<----- head blowing

For example, I didn't like Mary-Kate Olsen when she was twelve. But I liked her when she was 13, and when she was 14, and when she was 15...

Now she's almost twenty, she's too old for me

UMO wrote:

If the board software automatically censors the names of the sites we're not supposed to post from, how are we supposed to know which ones they are? It's totally useless to tell people: "Please don't post CENSORED, CENSORED or CENSORED."

It's simple - post models that are 18+ and you won't have to worry about what sites they come from. Problem solved

Dionysus wrote:

yeah, but how can we "really" tell if they are? Someone just pointed to me that anyone can add the "disclaimer" at the end of any site.

ps: that girl, in this thread, reminds me of a y0ung3r copy of the wife of John Travolta, Kelly something.

Marcus2 wrote:

Genau und Naturlich!! Exactly!

we are censored sometimes, without knowing what is and what is not to be censored. And we always read for some B.D. G.S. L.S. #.#. @.@
What are these? At least we'd appreciate full names of i-l- l-egal sites so we know what NOT to do or write!

Right?

moreover i agree with Dionysus, as if a pic is found from a legal site, why to care more ?

Albedo039 wrote:

GS is Good Samaritan, the owner of www.myangelfuns.com and the Admin here, in this forum.

The rest L.S B.D etc are sites that no longer exists but were showing y0ung g1rls in what some consider art and some consider C.P (ch*ild pr0n). The sets are distributed through Usenet mostly.

thanks for details info

ok, we all respect the rules.

but sometimes someone can break without intension, without knowing. That's why i see the admin and moderators are somehow not so stricly behaving. and that's good! and we thank them.

hey T-Bone... just because BUYAKASHA left me for that dude that ran the donkey rides at the carnival doesn't mean you should keep rubbing it in. thanks alot.

Hmmm dont know how I missed this one, but then again I wasnt a Mod Back in 2005.

thanks for rehashing this thread so it could come to my attention.

pictures are now deleted and thread is locked.