Forumophilia - 18 Years Online!
When downloading RAR files, would you prefer the contents were highly compressed, taking less time to download, but more time to extract, or a larger file that extracts quickly?
Tightly packed
88% [ 8 ]
Nice and loose
11% [ 1 ]
EvilJ
Cruzing
Very Respected Poster
http://rapidshare.de/
This is the link that you can upload your file too. then get the download link which will appear after it is finished.
edited:
Well, too answere the question correctly. it does not make a difference either way, me Mac can take it all. no quality loss. Smaller is faster, that is for the low end machines, Top end. I like the convenience of a one stop shop!
This is the link that you can upload your file too. then get the download link which will appear after it is finished.
edited:
Well, too answere the question correctly. it does not make a difference either way, me Mac can take it all. no quality loss. Smaller is faster, that is for the low end machines, Top end. I like the convenience of a one stop shop!
markus1
Retired Legend
Alp-boy
Respected Poster
Alp-boy
Respected Poster
Cruzing wrote:
I think the question is oriented to get another kind of answers.
Hope this answeres your question?
I think the question is oriented to get another kind of answers.
StratusFear
I'm probably spamming
I guess the question is not about video encoding, but RAR compression... since compression of RAR / Zip or any other kind of compression is completely lossless after extracted, there is no loss of quality... but if we are talking about encoding, that´s a diferent question...
And besides, 100 mb of any RAR file takes less than 1 minute to uncompress, and certainly will take a lot of time to download, so i vote for SUPER MEGA COMPRESSION (though movies compress so little)
And besides, 100 mb of any RAR file takes less than 1 minute to uncompress, and certainly will take a lot of time to download, so i vote for SUPER MEGA COMPRESSION (though movies compress so little)
Elmo
Since JPGs are already compressed, compression doesn't do very much at all. By putting a bunch of files in a RAR or a split RAR, you are just making uploading and downloading easier, but not really saving any space or bandwidth.
As an experiment, I just RARd a 102mb JPG. The RAR was 103mb when finished.
In the case of BMPs, TIFs and other larger formats, archiving is a great benefit.
As an experiment, I just RARd a 102mb JPG. The RAR was 103mb when finished.
In the case of BMPs, TIFs and other larger formats, archiving is a great benefit.