fight for your right to get your ass banned

We all know there were no nude pics of her as long as she was <18. now she is at minimum 18 and there are topless pics of her! so why no thread about this? in the amateur section there are hundreds of pics from girls <18! just noone knows it officially! Idont understand that! no law is broken by nonnude pics of a girl<18! dont be silly in this board! The comments at my last threadt were so stupid! just think about it 1 minute! i don`t want <18 nude girls in this forum either, this would be sick and criminal,but i think this is too much!

The topless pics will never be released.

They were a limited edition set sent to only 5 people.

Five.

5.


Five people only.

The thumbnail previews were taken from the site - three tiny little thumbnails showing boobs.

The five people who received the sets will never release them. Ever.
If they do, the webmaster will know about it - and never offer them any content ever again...

So I pose the question to you:

If you were granted the ability to be one of only FIVE people in the entire world with the privilidge to download exclusive nudie pics of the BTM girls...

Would you throw away that privilidge by distributing some of the pics?


Answer:
No chance. Not going to happen. Give up the dream. It's over.

Which incidently is a good reason for GS to offer exlusive limited edition sets at premium prices of say .. Katalin having orgy sex...

Now there's a business idea that can't be refused!

This is not only about wanting the topless set!
i dont understand this rules! there are thousands of pics in the amateur section with girls who didnt know about that their pics are in this forum! THIS is illegal and a crime! but pics of a dressed girl who got paid for it? dont be stupid!

I'd love to see her on this forum. Her actual age is unknown, and according to all the info available to the moderators, she's still not of age. We all agreed to abide by the rules when we joined the site, so no Jessi. Not hard to understand.

Feanor26 wrote:

It's not a copyright issue. Pictures of other models have been posted and webmasters have requested they be taken down, and the Mods did so.

It's a AGE matter.

Read what jessifan said.

Quote:

By "not of age" that means she's not 18. And pictures of models under 18 are NOT ALLOWED on this site.

That's the rule. It's not a difficult rule to understand.

As far as under 18's in the amatuer forum go, i've seen pictures deleted because the material was questionable. But because it's amateur it's near impossible for the Mods to know whether the person in the picture is under 18 or not.

Florence is a different matter though because they have the info on her.

Under 18 is not allowed. If you think there are amatuer pics breaching that rule in the amateur forum, drop a note to a Mod.
_________________

jejejeje wrote:

If one of these five people did release the said pics, how would the webmaster know which of the five did so?? Would he take away that said privilege of all five people cause of what one of them did?? That would be extremely unfair for others to suffer cause of one persons wrong doing.

Each of the sets were marked in a secret way so the webmaster would be able to tell where it had come from.

very simple to do.

each set has maybe one or two 'unique' pictures.

whichever unique pic is found in the set released to the public - gives away who released it - that person is black banned from future sets...

or worse ...

Feanor26 wrote:

Why say it's sick and criminal and then ask for pics At least be honest about it. There were <18 models out there that were very pretty and totally legal e.g. Gabrielle, Peachez, Katiebug etc. It's not as if they miraculously became attractive at 18.

That being said, this board has rules about posting pics and we have to respect them. No doubt if there wasn't a blanket 18+ policy on this board then some individuals would exploit the non-nude section to post pictures of girls who are not even in their teens yet. Also the 18+ policy for topless and nudes makes the board safe for North American surfers and it prevents any need for a discussion about whether a picture is legit or not.

So even though I think Florence is great, we have to respect the rules about posting pics. Beyond that, it's not wise to post any BTM or linked material here since the webmaster keeps an eye on this forum.

I have NOT asked for <18! im sure flo was over 18 when she took the mysterious topless pics. i know that its the rule in this forum not to post ANY (so even non nude) pics of young girls, but i think it must be ok to discuss such a rule (only for REAL models who are fully dressed and you can found in every catalouge! and such a model is/was florence).

Dionysus wrote:

Even if there were pics of florence topless as long as they are not nude pics (showing pubic hair, even that in some cases is legal as long as they are non erotic) they are completely legal in the US topless pictures done in a non pornographic way are legal.

Just spent a WHOLE 10 minutes scouring the net...

ALL her pics are out there. Even on torrent sites.. 350MB+ downloads including the "only 5 sets of topless pics released".... so gimmie a break.

Thats so rediculous its funny. If you dont want people to see you naked. Dont take the pics! DUH!

donk_316 wrote:

Take it from someone who knows, there's way more than 350mb of Jessi out there. The chances that you found the nudes of her are just about nil. I'll believe it when I see it.
The only things I see coming of this thread is it being locked, and possibly Feanor26 being banned, and his IP being blocked. Continually asking for content of <18 girls is frowned upon.
In other words, stop asking before it's too late. The moderators have been patient so far. How long do you think that's going to last?
For those of you who haven't already, READ THE FORUM RULES. It'll help you avoid problems.

Ok, AGAIN for such people like Jessifan who didnt get it: THIS IS NO SEARCH FOR THREAD!
This is meant to be a discussion thread and at least waverider got it and dyonisus a little bit...
This canting rule is worth a discussion i think!
So why should i be banned? because of practicing democracy? jessifan, from USA? lol