zorucla wrote:Good question, there's a lot of things I can't stand:
1) Anal. I know tons of people love it, I hate it.
2) Any scene where the cameraman thinks extreme closeups = sexy. Fuck that shit, I prefer to see the whole bodies of people.
3) Too much makeup. Pretty girls don't need it, ugly ones shouldn't be in porn in the first place.
-Zor
It's been interesting reading the various responses and the debates they begin. Most of them I agree, to some extent, with one or two points but not all of them until this offering. I may not have put point #3 this way, but I definitely don't disagree with it.
1. I've never seen the appeal of this to do or in a vid. We're (for the most part) talking here about beautiful young women. Why ignore that sweet thing that marks the difference and go for something that we ALL have. What a waste of a wonderful resource.
2. Extreme close-ups are overdone and uninteresting. For me much of the turn on is seeing the beauty that's having sex, not just one part of her. From those shots it might as well be Maggie or Hillary...ugh!!! Why not get a microscope and show mitosis? There's a CLOSE-UP!
3. Here, I'll go for a variation on your response. Regardless of how pretty the girl is, once she reaches the "jaded" point, the charm and appeal is gone. Makeup, applied with a putty knife, is part of it, but it's also listless or robotic performances and just looking worn out. Athletes have to know when to quit and so should porn stars.
Pamela Anderson is a perfect example of what I mean. She used to be really fine, but she just looks like a used up streetwalker now.